WHY KJVO?

1. Tyndale Bible
2. Matthew's Bible
3. Coverdale Bible
4. Great Bible
5. Geneva Bible
6. Bishop's Bible
7. Authorized Version 1611

• We cannot fulfill the above commandment without having the word!
• The idea that we need "modern" "versions" is a huge, cleverly devised fable, even done 2,000 years ago!
• What God's Word IS determines what it SAYS
• What God's Word SAYS determines what it MEANS
• God never asked mankind to correct His Word; He asked us to read it and believe it
• God never asked mankind to critique His Word or be a "textual critic"; He asked us to read it and believe it
• There has not been an original on earth of any "manuscript" in any language and God did not deal with originals; HE dealt with copes because they were worn out from use
• The reason that the minority texts are so pristine is because the ancients knew they were fakes, imposters
• The LXX and the Dead Sea Scrolls ARE NOT the Word of God
• God said He would preserve every WORD. The modern, serpentine "textual critics" say He only preserved the general meaning, not every word, calling God a liar!
• Erasmus’s work in the early 16th century and later editions by Stephanus and Beza. White argues that modern critical texts, such as the Nestle-Aland/United Bible Societies (NA/UBS) Dead Sea Scrolls or the Septuagint (LXX)
• Young children in schools iin America read the KJV in the classrooms a hundred years ago were raised on it and understood it, as well as foreigners, then as now. Today, people claim they do not understand it. Why? They simply do not read it, study it is all.

The false teachers, false apostles and heretics such as Origen then in Paul's day, as today, were taking Paul's epistles and rewriting them, removing things they did not like, did not believe or did not want to believe, and passing them around, trying to pass them off as epistles from Paul

2 Thessalonians 2:2
That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.

Later on it was Westcott and Hort, two occultists revered to this day by Christians in America as being actual believers, and they were spiritists, believing in ghosts, automatic writing, telekinesis, etc. and attended seances with their friend Madame Blavatsky

Those who say they cannot understand the King James Bible because the words are too old. archaic, fallen from use will then turn right around and instantly run to two dead languages no one on earth understands and say that it is for the purpose of "clarity"!!! Think about that. They won't.

People who reject the King James will also run to an appeal to authority and, strangely, an appeal to majority, which majority supports only the KJV!.

Know that the canon is already established and that the items rejected were all carefully checked, rechecked and rejected because they contained errors

Know that these can all be read by you, but you must never consider them to be God's Word

Know that the dishonesty of the proponents of the "modern" "versions" is that the translators used inferior mss. compared to what we have now, as in "oldest and best", which were simply unused and in pristine condition because of misuse, and were rejected by the translators because they were error laden.

Oldest is oldest; best is neither old nor young; it is simply God's Word or it is not, no matter how old!

Either God guided the translators or they simply worked in their sinful flesh and God lost His Word forever, because we no longer have "originals"

1. Completely wrong and rank heresy
2. In no way, shape or form any reason to reject the pure English Bible translation done in 1611, which is the same as today, no matter what. Is all rank heresy from televangelists a reason to reject the Gospel? No! Speaking of the unbelievers throughout Israel's history, Paul says to us:

God kept Israel and keeps you saved, not yourself. If God cannot preserve and keep His Word perfectly, how is it you think He can keep YOU and I once we are saved? Different God? Is not Israel back into their land and intact, still to this day?

• The words are pure, seven being the perfect number
• The same people who think that is should read "cleanse" in 1 John 8:9 say this should be changed from "pure" to "flawless" here-FOR NO REASON!
• "pure" is not archaic in any way, and the word "flawless" was therefore completely unnecessary to change it to, and shows it came from a different source, is not translated and is purely a paraphrase
• A furnace is is not archaic, is indeed a modern word, the word "crucible" was therefore unnecessary to change it to.
• "Silver" is not an archaic word, therefore "gold" with a footnote was unnecessary
• "tried" and "purified" are not an archaic words, therefore changing it to "refined" was therefore unnecessary
• God preserving His words in His Word by saying "Thou shalt keep them, O Lord, thou shalt preserve them...."
  Therefore changing it to:
  "You, Lord, will keep the needy safe and will protect us forever from the wicked" was therefore unnecessary
• Clearly, the NIV is in error, making that UNHOLY, not God's Word at all, making it wicked

• The word "as" is not archaic, therefore changing that to "like" was unnecessary
• A furnace made from dirt, clay, stone, sand, from things that make u0 the earth, is not the same as a furnace sitting ON the ground.
• "purified" is not an archaic word, therefore changing it to "filtered" was therefore unnecessary. Oh, and filtering is not even close to purifying. if you filter water. it still has to be purified
• They sort of got the rest the same, at least they referred to what was being kept forever
• And then they changed it from "preserve them" (the words of the LORD) to "protect him". Protect him? Who is this "him" being protected? Who decided that that was correct, since "preserve them" (the words of the LORD) is not archaic? Why would anyone change the subject of a verse in the Bible to make it not even make sense any more?

• The words are pure, not the promises, since "words" is not archaic, promises are always made from words written or spoken, and it said "words", with nothing archaic, nothing to change
• Again, as stated above, the furnace is made out of what? Just sitting on the ground? The words "furnace of earth" are in no way archaic, not needing to be changed
• The words "keep" is again changed to "protect US", the
• And again, the words are not being "preserved" here, but WE are being "guarded"

1. It is the only one that is a translation from the majority texts of over 5,000 manuscripts, various language bibles, while all others are translations from a minority amount of deliberately corrupted manuscripts; they are translated paraphrases at best, rank heresy at worst
2. God invented all languages

If God inspired it, did not preserve it like He promised, and lost it, so that He lied to us, what does that say about our salvation? Can He lose you, lie to you and also save you from hell? Whose god are we talking about here?

God said He would preserve it forever perfectly

God said it cannot be broken.

Reading the footnotes where the modern versions have removed entire verses, they will say lies like "late(r) manuscripts insert _________________", which is false and denies that they actually themselves REMOVED that word, that verse or verses.

In other words, no "late(r) manuscripts inserted anything. They took it out and lied about it!

It has ALWAYS been in books, always will be in a book, and we will be judged by a book, not scrolls, not rolls, not parchments, nor manuscripts

There have always, since the Garden, been two "words of God", the real and the close imposter. God does not have "versions", or "paraphrases" only Eve, the serpent and the Corinthians did

This continues to today

God always told mankind not to tamper with His Word

Only one was authorized by a King

God never said that the New Testament Scriptures would be in Greek to the Old Testament believers, yet here it is, in Greek. Did the apostles edit the mss and make "New Versions" of the Old Testament? I trow not!

Only one was done by experts who knew the languages well and used the God-honored texts

Only one is not copyrighted, and never will be, as God commanded us to publish it, not merchandi$e it

This goes against God, fully. God NEVER asked anyone to charge money for His Word. The only part copyrighted in a KJV that you buy today is everything outside of the text of the sixty six books (notes, appendices, etc.) You can freely copy a KJV and distribute it as much as you want and God encourages it. Not so with the new "versions" as they belong to the publishers and not the church. Ask them and their lawyers. I tested it. They went silent when I challenged them that they cl;aimed it was God's Word. I tild them God would never copyright His Word and then ask us to share it and publish it. I told them that I would see them in court and they would jave to explain why it says "GOD'S WORD" on the cover when it is theirs, according to they themselves. They went silent, back into the darkness. Not that I would ever distribute it anyways! Ew! Yuck!

"But they did not have copyrights in 1611!" That is cute. But God never did, nor ever will have one. He is not subject to man's laws. You should stick to copyrighting your own books and stop telling people that your "newer" "version". is God's Word tenm and stop lying and just be honest and admit it is YOURS!

Greeks no longer speak Koine Greek nor do Jews speak Old Testament Hebrew

You cannot get a copyright unless you alter the text with at least ten percent differences

At some point during the editing/paraphrasing process, you will run into your own errors being thrust upon any text to beat it into submission so you can get that copyright, because the law states that it must have a ten percent difference, something none of the scribes and translators cared about. They cared about accuracy, not money

The newer "ver$ion$" contain all sorts of errors, omissions, additions, doctrinal, geographical, historical errors, cover to cover, not to mention blatant heresies

God never really dealt much with "originals", only copies-of copies-of copies

God's Word is either 100% Holy or it is evil, deceitful, because the word "Holy" and "Almost Holy" are not the same, and there is no "almost" Holy when we speak of God, or else He is not God

The Scriptures claim to be the Words of a Holy God, not of men, hundreds of times, so do a search for "the word of the LORD" and start counting.

God magnified His Word above His Name, and His Name is HOLY

English is the most spoken language on earth today, worldwide, even though more people speak Chinese. Because? They live mostly in China.

The English of the King James Bible had already fallen out of use at that time and was as archaic then as now.

That book of books is why we are here in America, why the Renaissance and Reformation came about as the result of that book alone.

Since Westcott and Hort polluted the word of God, deliberately, there has not been a single lasting revival in America, and now we are in Laodicea

We were never called to be "textual critics", nor were the Levite Scribes, any and all translators called by God who translated, preserved and copied those Scriptures

The textual critics in God's Word were the serpent, Eve and the Corinthians

A person who does not believe in perfect Scriptures in the KJV can never say which other "Bible" is the perfect, inerrant, infallible words of the Living God they claim to believe in

IF THE KJV CONTAINS ERRORS OR IS IMPERFECT, FALLEN FROM USE, WHY DON'T YOU JUST CORRECT IT ALL AND MAKE IT PERFECT FOR US, WITH NO COPYRIGHT?

Important doctrines are removed, errors are introduced

Yes, God can use the modern versons. God also used Balaam's ass. You can find pieces of hay in a pile of manure, but that does not make manure a good meal. You can find a piece of edible food in a trash can, but that does not make trash cans restaurants!!

There is only one true God, but there are also many false gods. There is one true Body of Christ, one True Church, made from and made up of true, born-again believers, yet there are many false churches. So why is it so wrong to teach that there is one true Bible, yet many false "bibles"? One Body, one Faith, one God, one Heavenly Father, one LORD, one God the Son, one Holy Spirit, one Church, one Word, one body, one Baptism, but 200 plus "versions"?

No one on earth who speaks of "the originals" has ever seen one

Which GREEK are we talking about when we say "the Greek"? Origen's? Or God's?

There is no place in Scripture that says that the inventor/creator of languages cannot translate perfectly, that is a manmade concept only.

The KJV is made from the MAJORITY text, worn out, ragged from use. The modern "versions" come from the minority, unused by God mss., Mostly the Vaticanus, Alexandrinus, Sinaiticus texts, not to mention the deliberately corrupted text made to undermine belief in the Word of God, the Westcott and Hort Greek text

God is not the author of confusion, and multiple, conflicting "ver$ion$" lead to that. Look at the Laodicean church today

100 years ago, we argued over what it MEANT by what it SAID; now it is all about "WHAT IT IS!" How sad.

Westcott and Hort were full blown, New Aged, occultic, pagan heretics into automatic writing, telekinesis, black magic, spiritism, ghosts, phantoms, associated with Madame Blavatsky, an occultist

We are told to live by every word out of the mouth of God, but somehow we "do not any longer have them. Alas, they are lost."

It was translated into Modern English, not Middle English, not Olde English. If we do not understand it, that is our fault.

"ye", "thee", "thou" were not even in use in the early 1600s; they were translated to be accurate, so we would not be confused, like all translations, so there is no confusion in communication

There is a vast, universal, eternal difference between "ye" and "you", as Jesus told Nicodemus that "ye" must be born again, not "you", as "ye" means specifically "all of you, not just you, Nicodemus", which includes us (Gentiles), all of Israel, all of the world. Nicodemus is not the only one who needed and needs to get saved, but the false teaching of "you" here would not be accurate and introduce error, much welcomed by the unbelievers, occultists, etc.

Small children raised on it understand it, kids 100 years ago understood it, foreigners have no problems. It take twelve years of American schools to dumb down a person to not understand it

Going to two dead languages which you do not know , nor speak nor write nor understand to "understand" or "get clarity" is a lot more foolish silly than trying to understand something written in your own language, which has dictionaries for it and people to ask who do understand it

There has never been even one single attempt to "update the archaic language of the KJV" as they claim needs to be done. Not one time.

Only the number ONE is the number of unity...all others are not

Only one IS the Word of God; the rest are imposters which CONTAIN the Word of God

Not one person ever died to bring us the "modern" "ver$ion$", during any "purification process"; many died to give us the KJV

If one inspects the lives, beliefs of all of the hereticks who tampered with the Scriptures, one finds that they were pagan unbelievers, Gpd haters who did not believe in the deity of Christ, the virgin birth, and all of the major doctrines of the New Testament that we believe as Christians, as in THE GOSPEL ITSELF!

If one does due diligence, such as a side by side, verse by verse comparison, and does not walk away angry, they need to check their spiritual pulse. The MVs are dreadfully lacking and deeply corrupted

God never said He would keep His "message", but every word, forever. If He did not, He failed us. He is not God.

The Word of God is not what "we prefer" or "we like", but it is what it is, despite us

Oldest is not best....despite what we are told. Oldest is oldest, and unused. The best was worn out, used of God and man, and replaced

Every word matters

Faith cometh by hearing and hearing by that Word of God, not by spelling, punctuation, etc.

Different words have different meanings

Entire verses are missing, not just words

Not until 1881 did anyone even question it, under Westcott and Hort, using inferior, minority mss, editing them to produce a false "bible" which fit their pet doctrines (occultic)

God only spoke about scholars twice; and never in a good light

• The first century saw intense persecution of Christians, where they caught them, killed them, maybe burned them at the stake but, for sure, burned their copies of the Scriptures
• With a feather pen and ink, it took most of a full year for the average person to copy a set of the books of the Word of God, very arduous
• People in all places on earth after the spread of Christianity, for 1,000 years, into all languages from the original languages, were translating them, without access to the other people's work.
• After this time, the persecution was abated in most places for a time, so copies of the books were then assembled for the only English translation, the King James Bible
• It needs to be said that these books were gathered from all over, with the originals worn out, replaced with many generations of exact copies coming together from Africa, Europe, Asia, etc to one place.
• At that time and, by that time, nearly 5,000 copies of the Word of God, in many, many earthly languages, all agreed with one another!
• In 1946, they discovered 24,00 more manuscripts underlying the King James Bible

• Same time frame. starting in the first century
• Cults formed, Origen Adamantius being one main leader
• As the Word of God spread, as it was being copied, it was also being literally changed to meet the cults' desires by Origin, others, their disciples
• Words were removed that did not match their liking, words added, words changed-then they tried to pass it off as the real deal
• Enter two lines of manuscripts, to "Bibles"
• This would then be the "Alexandrian cult" people, in Egypt, a place God warned Israel repeatedly never to even look back to, absolutely never to return to, no matter what!
• Since these were not used by the actual Christians, they were preserved, not worn out and, when discovered, they were old
• Their names are Vaticanus (you guessed it, found in the Vatican library!), Codex Sinaiticus , of questionable origin with conflicting reports. , Alexandrinus (after Alexandria, Egypt). These three were translated into the Latin Vulgate, perfectly done, from something deliberately corrupted! That Latin Vulgate is a Roman Catholic book.
  (Jeremiah 42:19 [KJV])
  The LORD hath said concerning you, O ye remnant of Judah; Go ye not into Egypt: know certainly that I have admonished you this day.
  As a threat for their sin, rebellion, like "Go ahead, keep thhis up. You keep doing this and I WILL bring you back where you will regret it!
  (Deuteronomy 28:68 [KJV])
  And the LORD shall bring thee into Egypt again with ships, by the way whereof I spake unto thee, Thou shalt see it no more again: and there ye shall be sold unto your enemies for bondmen and bondwomen, and no man shall buy you.

• Fast forward to the 1881 Revision Committee
• This is a total of three complete manuscripts, with 46 fragments for the "modern" "versions", compared to 64,000 manuscripts, books, foreign translations, etc. underlying the King James Bible

• The word "Lucifer", the only instance, is removed from the "modern" "versions"
• The word "hell" is removed from the "modern" "versions" and replaced with two pagan words, "hades" and "sheol"
• The word "hell" is removed from the "modern" "versions"
• 1 John 5:7 is removed from the "modern" "versions"
• Matthew 17:21 is removed from the "modern" "versions"
• Acts 8:37 is removed from the "modern" "versions"
• Matthew 18:11 is removed from the "modern" "versions"
• Mark 9:44 and Mark 9:36 are removed from the "modern" "versions"
• Mark 1126 is removed from the "modern" "versions"
• Mark 15:28 is removed from the "modern" "versions"
• Luke 17:36 is removed from the "modern" "versions"
• John 5:4 is removed from the "modern" "versions"
• Acts 15L34 is removed from the "modern" "versions"
• Acts 24:7 is removed from the "modern" "versions"
• Acts 28:29 is removed from the "modern" "versions"
• Romans 16:24 is removed from the "modern" "versions"
• Matthew 23:14 is removed from the "modern" "versions"
• Matthew 5:22 "without a cause" is removed from the "modern" "versions"

• (Luke 4:4 [KJV])
  And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God.
  (Luke 4:4 [KJV])
  And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone_____________.
• Luke 9:56 is removed from the "modern" "versions", Jesus explaining His mission to save us
• Isaiah 7:14
  Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.
  The "modern" "versions" changed "virgin" tp "a young woman" and "a woman". Now stop and think about that. A woman having a child or a young woman having a child. So? That happens every day, all day and has for as long as man has been on earth, since Eve. Any woman can have a child who is not barren! But not a virgin, unless it is God doing a miracle! Miracle removed here in "modern" "versions"
  The consequences of this tampering are:
  
  1. Mary was a fornicator;
  2. God has lied to us in Mat. 1:22-23;
  3. Christ was not God, not deity (having a physical father, He was only human); and
  4. Christ was a sinner as he would then be a descendant of Adam and inherit Adam's nature as in Romans 5:12.

• Colossians 1:14
  "through his blood" is removed from the "modern" "versions"
• 1 Timothy 3:16
  "God was manifest in the flesh" is changed to "He was manifest in the flesh" is in the "modern" "versions" (300 mss)
• Mark 1:2 quotes two prophets (Malachi and Isaiah), saying "as quoted in the prophets", but the "modern" "versions" changed that to "Isaiah the prophet" (8 corrupted mss)
• John 7:8 the word "yet" is removed is removed from the "modern" "versions"
• Acts 20:28 "purchased" ps changed to "obtained" is removed from the "modern" "versions"
• It must be understood that the "modern" "versions" use a small amount of deliberately corrupted mss. while the KJV uses the majority set of mss that existed in 1611 to today
• It must be understood and acknowledged that there must be deliberately corrupted mss on earth, since Genesis through the Word of God and until until today
• (Zechariah 9:9 [KJV])
  Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion; shout, O daughter of Jerusalem: behold, thy King cometh unto thee: he is just, and having salvation; lowly, and riding upon an ass, and upon a colt the foal of an ass.
  (Zechariah 9:9 ([RSV])
  Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion; shout aloud O daughter of JerusalI; behold, your King comes unto you; triumph and victorious is He; humble and riding on an ass, on a colt the foal of an ass.
• Matthew 1:25 ([KJV])
  And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS. (KJ)
  Matthew 1:25 (NIV, NAS])
  But he had no union with her until she gave birth to a son. And he gave him the name Jesus.
Same attack as above. A son is meaningless if this is the Messiah fulfilling Isaiah 9:6. The KJV says "firstborn" son, not just "a son", which could be her second, third son, etc., which is all of the difference and destroys and removes the vrgin birth of Jesus Christ for no reason. Who would want that done? "yea, hath God said,,,,,?" I gear hissing!
• Joshua 5:14
  And he said, Nay; but as captain of the host of the LORD am I now come. And Joshua fell on his face to the earth, and did worship, and said unto him, What saith my lord unto his servant?

• (Matthew 1:10 [KJV])
  And Ezekias begat Manasses; and Manasses begat Amon; and Amon begat Josias;
  (Matthew 1:10 [ESV])
  and Hezekiah the father of Manasseh, and Manasseh the father of Amos,[a] and Amos the father of Josiah,
  a. Matthew 1:10 Amos is probably an alternate spelling of Amon; some manuscripts Amon; twice in this verse
  No, that is false! This was deliberately altered.
• (Proverbs 17:8 [KJV])
  A gift is as a precious stone in the eyes of him that hath it: whithersoever it turneth, it prospereth.
  (Proverbs 17:8 [ESV])
  A bribe is like a magic[a] stone in the eyes of the one who gives it; wherever he turns he prospers.
  A gift is not a bribe. Ever give or get a gift and then being accused of corruption? These two different sentences have completely different meanings.
  A "magical stone"? What is this? The Harry Potter Bible?
• (James 3:12 [KJV])
  Can the fig tree, my brethren, bear olive berries? either a vine, figs? so can no fountain both yield salt water and fresh.
  (James 3:12 [ESV])
  Can a fig tree, my brothers, bear olives, or a grapevine produce figs? Neither can a salt pond yield fresh water.
  WHAAAAAAT??? Who said pond?

• (Psalms 78:36 [KJV])
  Nevertheless they did flatter him with their mouth, and they lied unto him with their tongues.
  CSB
  But they deceived him with their mouths, they lied to him with their tongues,
  CSBA
  But they deceived him with their mouths, they lied to him with their tongues,
  Can anyone actually DECEIVE God? Which god are we talking about here?

(Revelation 1:6 [KJV])
And hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father; to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.
(Matthew 4:10 [KJV])
Then saith Jesus unto him, Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.
(Matthew 9:18 [KJV])
While he spake these things unto them, behold, there came a certain ruler, and worshipped him, saying, My daughter is even now dead: but come and lay thy hand upon her, and she shall live.
(Matthew 20:20 [KJV])
Then came to him the mother of Zebedee's children with her sons, worshipping him, and desiring a certain thing of him.
(Mark 5:6 [KJV])
But when he saw Jesus afar off, he ran and worshipped him,
(Luke 24:52 [KJV])
And they worshipped him, and returned to Jerusalem with great joy:
(Matthew 6:13 [KJV])
And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil: For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. Amen.
(Matthew 19:17 [KJV])
And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.
(Mark 9:43-44 [KJV])
And if thy hand offend thee, cut it off: it is better for thee to enter into life maimed, than having two hands to go into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched: Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched.
MARK 1:2-3 17 (Mark 10:21 [KJV])
Then Jesus beholding him loved him, and said unto him, One thing thou lackest: go thy way, sell whatsoever thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, take up the cross, and follow me.
MARK 16:9-20 19 LUKE 1:34 19 LUKE 2:14 20 LUKE 2:33 20 LUKE 4:4 21 LUKE 9:54-56 21 LUKE 22:64 21 LUKE 23:38 21 LUKE 23:42 22 LUKE 24:6 22 LUKE 24:42 22 JOHN 1:18 22 JOHN 3:36 24 JOHN 6:35 24 JOHN 6:47 24 JOHN 8:1-11 24 ACTS 8:36-37 24 ACTS 20:28 25 ROMANS 8:1 25 ROMANS 14:10B, 12 25 2 TIMOTHY 3:16 26 HEBREWS 1:3 26 HEBREWS 2:11 26 MICAH 5:2 27 HEBREWS 2:16 27
• 1 John 1:8-9 [KJV])
  If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
  CLEANSE, v.t.
  1. To purify; to make clean; to remove filth, or foul matter of any kind, or by any process whateve, as by washing, rubbing, scouring, scraping, purging, ventilation, etc.; as, to cleanse the hands or face to cleanse a garment; to cleanse the bowels; to cleanse a ship; to cleanse an infected house.
  2. To free from a foul or infectious disease; to heal. Lev 14:4, 8; Mark 1:42.
  3. To free from ceremonial pollution, and consecrate to a holy use. Num 8:15; Exek. 43:20. 4. To purify from guilt. 1 John 1:7. 5. To remove; as, to cleanse a crime.
  Apparently, some of the "modern" "versions" have "updated" the proper word cleanse to purify, in order to $$$$$ell bibles. That word in English had its first definition as purify. not to mention the context of the rest of Scripture which clearly tells us that we are purified. That need to "update the archaic language of that p;de wprd "cleanse" to "make it clearer, more accurate and more concise" is, like all that they do, a ;ie to $$ell is all that that is.

• If the publishers wanted to make GOD'S WORD (not theirs which is man's word) "more readable", "more clear" or "more understandable" or "more accurate" and everything else they make money on, then they need to LEAVE IT ALONE! If you claim it is GOD'S WORD and not your word, then remove your copyright on it, which goes against God's command to publish it!
  (Psalms 68:11)
  The Lord gave the word: great was the company of those that published it.
• "Oldest and best mss". This is such a massive lie. Oldest is oldest and the Word has been attacked since the Garden by the serpent, who tried to stop Jesus saving us from our sins. Oldest is merely oldest; we do not need any "new discoveries" as God is done with His Word and has been since 1611, being in one book, perfectly intact, translated into English that is at a low high school level, being from the correct materials
• So many more examples, a lot of homework for anyone who loves God's Word to do. Do you care enough to do that careful study?

1. Consists of 1 and 2 Esdras, the book of Tobit, the book of Judith, the "Rest" of Esther, the Wisdom of Solomon, the book of Sirach, (also titled Ecclesiasticus), the book of Baruch, The Letter of Jeremiah, Song of the Three Young Men, the book of Susanna, Bel and the Dragon, The Additions to Daniel, The Prayer of Manasseh, and 1 and 2 Maccabees
2. It was rejected both by Christians and Jews as not Scripture
3. It is not ever quoted in the New Testament. Other real Old Testament books are not always quoted either, but that is up to God, not us, and that does not make the Apocrypha Scripture, and means it is not part of the Canon of Scripture
4. Josephus never even mentioned it, and the early Christian writers such as Origen, Cyril of Jerusalem, Athanasius, Jerome spoke out against the Apocrypha
5. The errors in it are obvious:
   
   • It only takes one, single, lonely error to disqualify the Apocrypha, whereas there are many
   • The use of magic (Tobit 6:5-7)
   • Forgiveness by works (Tobit 4:11, 12:9)
   • Money for the sins of the dead, as in R.C.C. indulgences (2 Maccabees 12:43)
   • Historical Error: Nebuchadnezzar was called the king of the Assyrians (Judith 1:5), but he was the king of the Babylonians
   • Historical Error: The Jews would be in captivity seven generations (Baruch 6:2), not seventy years()
   • This list does not include internal and external contradictions

1. Sixty six books, 40 authors, no Apocrypha, no Vaticanus, no Sinaiticus, no Alexandrian text or influence, no Septuagint (LXX), or extra added anything
2. Translated in 1611 into English from other languages.
3. No versions
4. Only authorized translation
5. Only one with a solid heritage
6. Only one hated by R.C.C.
7. Only one men gave their lives for, murdered by the R.C.C.
8. The Apocrypha was indeed included in the first edition of the 1611 King James Bible, sandwiched between the testaments, but only for historical purposes of the 400 silent years, and it was not considered Scripture, was separated out and the people were told and knew that it was not the Scriptures
9. It was removed because of protests later. A copy of the original 1611 with the Apocrypha is still available for purchase online at various places

• Romans 1:1
• KJV
  Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated unto the gospel of God,

• NIV
  Paul, a servant of Christ Jesus, called to be an apostle and set apart for the gospel of God—

• ISSUE
  Jesus Christ is not an archaic term, so changing the order was unnecessary. Separated is not an archaic word and to then make it two words when it was one understandable one is evil.

• Romans 1:2
• KJV
  (Which he had promised afore by his prophets in the holy scriptures,)

• NIV
  the gospel he promised beforehand through his prophets in the Holy Scriptures

• ISSUE
  Using "afore" which is two syllables versus "beforehand" which is three is a practice throughout the Scriptures when they mess with it. The correctors often even use a harder to understand word to change it to and the KJV is also at a lower grade level English than the "modern" "versions"

• Romans 1:3
• KJV
  Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh;

• NIV
  regarding his Son, who as to his earthly life[a] was a descendant of David,
  a. Romans 1:3 Or who according to the flesh

• ISSUE
  Once again we see deliberate changing of wording.
  The entire Gospel message from the Fall to the end of Revelation is about the flesh of mankind now being evil and in need of redemption, animal flesh sacrifices which started right there at the fall with the LORD Himself making coats of skins for Adam and Eve. "In the flesh" means that He was made in the image of our sinful flesh:
  Another thing is that God used the word "seed" from Abraham on to describe descendants. The word "descendant" never appears in the KJV, only the word "seed" over and over, cover to cover-even before the Fall into sin!

  THE SEEDS

  Genesis 3:15
  And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.
  Revelation 12:17
  And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.
  (Romans 8:3 [KJV])
  For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:
  2 Corinthians 10:3-5 For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh: (For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;) Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;

• Romans 1:4
• KJV
  And declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead:
• NIV
  and who through the Spirit of holiness was appointed the Son of God in power[b] by his resurrection from the dead: Jesus Christ our Lord.
  b. Romans 1:4 Or was declared with power to be the Son of God
  "Declared" is not an archaic word at all. Neither is the word "with" as in "with power", so there was no need to change that to "in power"
• ISSUE
  b. "Or was declared with power to be the Son of God"
  Declared is not an archaic word at all. Neither is the word "with" as in "with power", so there was no need to change that to "in power"

• Romans 1:5
• KJV
  By whom we have received grace and apostleship, for obedience to the faith among all nations, for his name:
• NIV
  Through him we received grace and apostleship to call all the Gentiles to the obedience that comes from[c] faith for his name’s sake.
  c. Romans 1:5 Or that is
  
• ISSUE
"By" is not an archaic word and therefore there was no need to change that to "through". "By" and "through", no reason for change, and it is a smaller word with the same meaning turned into the same meaning with more letters, for what?
"By whom" in English refers to the subject being spoken of previously and is in no way "archaic", meaning no need to replace it with "Through him". "By" changed to "through" and "whom" changed to "him", inexcusable.
Now look at the rest and ask yourself. Since both do not say the same thing,
1. There is no final authority, leaving that to the reader, not to God Who wrote His Word using mankind through prophets, men, and via angels.
2. It is not word for word translation, as all translation is done correctly. but changing the text to $$$$ell
3. The obedience in the KJV is for us; in the corrupted bibles it is for the Gentiles. Not the same words. They first have to get saved first in order to obey. Not one of the three words God used here are archaic, as in "among" "all" "nations". In fact. Israel is one of the nations and Paul was a Jewish apostle to those Gentile nations, including first his own who rejected him

(Acts 13:46 [KJV])
Then Paul and Barnabas waxed bold, and said, It was necessary that the word of God should first have been spoken to you: but seeing ye put it from you, and judge yourselves unworthy of everlasting life, lo, we turn to the Gentiles.

• Romans 1:14
• KJV
  I am debtor both to the Greeks, and to the Barbarians; both to the wise, and to the unwise.
• NIV
  I am obligated both to Greeks and non-Greeks, both to the wise and the foolish.
• ISSUE
  A barbarian is a barbarian, a Greek is a person from Greece. What was a Barbarian? Not a Greek."barbarian was used to describe all non-Greek-speaking peoples, including Persians, Egyptians, Medes and Phoenicians, and those Barbarians from the Barbary Coast of Africa". Today the word Barbarian used to insult crude people. .
  Non-Greeks are simply generic for anyone, any place on earth who is not a Greek, which would even include a Roman or a Jew of that day nd today. "Barbarian" is not an archaic word. So no need to change it.
  GREEK, a. Pertaining to Greece. [See Gray.]
  GREEK, n. A native of Greece.
  A Greek was simply the Gentiles in the Roman-Greco empire. It also is not an archaic word in any way.
  BARBA'RIAN, n. [L. barbarus;. The sense is, foreign, wild, fierce.]
  1. A man in his rude, savage state; an uncivilized person.
  2. A cruel, savage, brutal man; one destitute of pity or humanity.
  3. A foreigner. The Greeks and Romans denominated most foreign nations barbarians; and many of these were less civilized than themselves, or unacquainted with their language, laws and manners. But with them,the word was less reproachful than with us.
  BARBA'RIAN, a. Belonging to savages; rude; uncivilized.
  2. Cruel; inhuman. This injects a genuine error that is not there in the text of th Word of God to $$$ell Bible, not caring about accuracy. This was not accidental. You and I can be barbaric. All Greeks were not so, either. The NIV implies they are.

• Romans 1:15/li>
• KJV
  So, as much as in me is, I am ready to preach the gospel to you that are at Rome also.
• NIV
  That is why I am so eager to preach the gospel also to you who are in Rome.
• ISSUE
  "As much as in me is" means "with all of my strength". "Ready" is not the same as "eager". Ready means prepared; eager does not mean we are ready, equipped, talented, prepared to do anything at all, but eager to, not necessarily able to, not ready to yet. We can be eager and unprepared. We can be prepared and not eager. They are not the same thing.
  "So eager" means a desire, not with all one's might or strength. Different words, different meanings.

• Romans 1:16
• KJV
  For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.
• NIV
  For I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God that brings salvation to everyone who believes: first to the Jew, then to the Gentile.
• ISSUE
  Notice "of Christ" is removed here. Who would want that? "For" is replaced by "because" for no valid reason. The word "Greek" then meant a Gentile, so no need to change it, simply learn and teach it and let the text tell you what it say, do not make it say what you want it to say. I hear hissssssing.

• Romans 1:17
• KJV
  For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith.
• NIV
  For in the gospel the righteousness of God is revealed—a righteousness that is by faith from first to last,[e] just as it is written: “The righteous will live by faith.”[f]
  f. Hab. 2:4
• ISSUE
  All one needs to know about what the word "therein" means is the actual context of the word, which tells us that it is the Gospel. We use that even today in legal documents,
  "And all information contained therein...."
  This is what Paul is quoting here:
  (Habakkuk 2:4 [KJV])
  Behold, his soul which is lifted up is not upright in him: but the just shall live by his faith.
  That said, it is written WRONG in the NIV!!! It is "the just" not "the righteous" in Habakkuk 2:4, making that a misquote and not "as it is written" but rather it needs to say, "NOT as it is written", because that it NOT how it is written.

• Romans 1:18
• KJV
  For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
• NIV
  The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness,
• ISSUE
  "Is revealed" was deliberately and falsely changed to "is being revealed". This error is common in the "modern" "versions" when it comes to salvation, as the words "is saved" or "are saved" are changed to "is being saved" and :are being saved" which is false doctrine, false teaching. "Ungodliness" was changed to "godlessness"
  GOD'LESSNESS, noun The state of being impious or irreligious.
  UNGOD'LINESS, noun Impiety; wickedness; disregard of God and his commands and neglect of his worship; or any positive act of disobedience or irreverence.
  See the problem here? They do not mean the same thing. The words "unrighteousness of men" was changed to "wickedness of people". This also is without merit.
  To hold the truth is more than sufficient to know what those who attack the Word do. Tp change that to "suppress" is deliberate and unnecessary and
  HOLD, v.t. pret.held; pp. held. Holden is obsolete in elegant writing. [Gr. to hold or restrain; Heb. to hold or contain.]
  1. To stop; to confine; to restrain from escape; to keep fast; to retain. It rarely or never signifies the first act of seizing or falling on, but the act of retaining a thing when seized or confined. To grasp, is to seize, or to keep fast in the hand; hold coincides with grasp in the latter sense, but not in the former. We hold a horse by means of a bridle. An anchor holds a ship in her station.
  2. To embrace and confine, with bearing or lifting. We hold an orange in the hand, or a child in the arms.
  3. To connect; to keep from separation. The loops held one curtain to another. Exo 36.
  4. To maintain, as an opinion. He holds the doctrine of justification by free grace.
  5. To consider; to regard; to think; to judge, that is, to have in the mind.
  I hold him but a fool.
  The Lord will not hold him guiltless, that taketh his name in vain. Exo 20.
  6. To contain, or to have capacity to receive and contain. Here is an empty basket that holds two bushels. This empty cask holds thirty gallons. The church holds two thousand people.
  7. To retain within itself; to keep from running or flowing out. A vessel with holes in its bottom will not hold fluids.
  They have hewed them out broken cisterns that can hold no water. Jer 2.
  8. To defend; to keep possession; to maintain. We mean to hold what anciently we claim Of empire.
  9. To have; as, to hold a place, office or title.
  10. To have or possess by title; as,he held his lands of the king. The estate is held by copy of court-rol
  l. 11. To refrain; to stop; to restrain; to withhold.
  Hold your laughter. Hold your tongue.
  Death! what do'st? O, hold thy blow.
  12. To keep; as, hold your peace.
  13. To fix; to confine; to compel to observe or fulfill; as, to hold one to his promise.
  14. To confine; to restrain from motion.
  The Most High--held still the flood till they had passed. 2 Esdras.
  15. To confine; to bind; in a legal or moral sense. He is held to perform his covenants.
  16. To maintain; to retain; to continue. But still he held his purpose to depart.
  17. To keep in continuance or practice.
  And Night and Chaos, ancestors of nature, hold Eternal anarchy.
  18. To continue; to keep; to prosecute or carry on. seed-time and harvest,heat and hoary-frost, Shall hold their course.
  19. To have in session; as, to hold a court or parliament; to hold a council
  . 20. To celebrate; to solemnize; as, to hold a feast. 21. To maintain; to sustain; to have in use or exercise; as, to hold an argument or debate.
  22. To sustain; to support.
  Thy right hand shall hold me. Psa 139.
  23. To carry; to wield.
  They all hold swords, being expert in war. Song 3. 24. To maintain; to observe in practice.
  Ye hold the traditions of men.
  Mark 7:7
  Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.
  25. To last; to endure. The provisions will hold us, till we arrive in port. So we say, the provisions will last us; but the phrase is elliptical for will hold or last for us, the verb being intransitive.
  To hold forth, to offer; to exhibit; to propose.
  Observe the connection of ideas in the propositions which books hold forth and pretend to teach.
  1. To reach forth; to put forward to view.
  To hold in, to restrain; to curb; to govern by the bridle.
  1. To restrain in general; to check; to repress. To hold off, to keep at a distance.
  To hold on, to continue or proceed in; as, to hold on a course.
  To hold out, to extend; to stretch forth.
  The king held out to Esther the golden scepter.Est 5.
  1. To propose; to offer.
  Fortune holds out these to you as rewards.
  2. To continue to do or suffer.
  He cannot long hold out these pangs. [Not used.]
  To hold up, to raise; as, hold up your head.
  1. To sustain; to support.
  He holds himself up in virtue.
  2. To retain; to withhold.
  3. To offer; to exhibit. He held up to view the prospect of gain.
  4. To sustain; to keep from falling.
  To hold one's own, to keep good one's present condition; not to fall off, or to lose ground. In seamen's language, a ship holds her own, when she sails as fast as another ship, or keeps her course. To hold, is used by the Irish, for to lay, as a bet, to wager. I hold a crown, or a dollar; but this is a vulgar use of the word.
  
  SUPPRESS', v.t. [L. suppressus, supprimo; sub and premo, to press.]
  1. To overpower and crush; to subdue; to destroy; as, to suppress a rebellion; to suppress a mutiny or riot; to suppress opposition.
  Every rebellion when it is suppressed, makes the subject weaker, and the government stronger. 2. To keep in; to restrain from utterance or vent; as, to suppress the voice; to suppress sighs.
  3. To retain without disclosure; to conceal; not to tell or reveal; as, to suppress evidence.
  She suppresses the name, and this keeps him in a pleasing suspense.
  4. To retain without communication or making public; as, to suppress a letter; to suppress a manuscript.
  5. To stifle; to stop; to hinder from circulation; as, to suppress a report. 6. To stop; to restrain; to obstruct from discharges; as, to suppress a diarrhea, a hemorrhage and the like.

• Romans 1:19
• KJV
  Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
• NIV
  since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them.

• ISSUE
  MAN'IFEST, a. [L. manifestus.]
  1. Plain, open, clearly visible to the eye or obvious to the understanding; apparent; not obscure or difficult to be seen or understood. From the testimony, the truth we conceive to be manifest.
  The word "manifest" already means open and clear. it is not archaic, still today commonly in use.

• Romans 1:20
• KJV
  For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
• NIV
  For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

• ISSUE
  Let's see.... more word and sentence games. Switch the order of the same words because modern English speaking people need that.
  The word "things" is changed to "qualities", two different words. The lesson is that today we can now see molecules, atoms which are invisible and are the things which make up all of creation. Not to mention that all things show God's handiwork. Microscopic creatures are now known to also show God's Glory. Add to that the furthest things in the universe we have seen with travel and telescopes. These are all things that show God's qualities. No need to change that word as it is not archaic.
  The Godhead is:
  GOD'HEAD, n. god'hed.
  1. Godship; deity; divinity; divine nature or essence; applied to the true God, and to heathen deities.
  2. A deity in person; a god or goddess.
  GOD'HEAD, n. god'hed.
  
  So there was no need to change the text, except for $ale$.
  "they are without excuse" was changed to "people are without excuse". Who exactly is without excuse? Animals? Rocks? Plants?
  Just a few examples, look at t he rest of the verse and notice what was altered.

• Romans 1:21
• KJV
  Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
• NIV
  For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened.

• ISSUE
  The list of changed words that were done unnecessarily:
  1. "Because that, when they knew God" was changed to "For although they knew God, ", an unnecessary change which does nothing to 'update the archaic language of the KJV" and "when" (a time) is not the same as "although" (conditional state)
  2. "because that"changed to "for"; and "that" is removed
  3. "neither" is added
  4. "nor was now added to accompany "neither"
  5. "were thankful" changed to "gave thanks to him"
  6. "became vain in their imaginations" changed to "their thinking became futile ", which can be referenced in the Pre Flood world:
     (Genesis 6:5 [KJV])
     And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.

  7. "vain" changed to "futile"
  8. "heart" (a collective, unified heart of evil and darkness, wickedness) changed to "hearts" (individual hearts)
  9. "was" was then changed to "were" to match the plural word

• Romans 1:27
• KJV
  And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
• NIV
  In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.

• ISSUE
  Look here how many words were changed without any reason, except for the puepose of getting more $ale$. The one word "likewise" has been changed to "in the same way", four words, four syllables. Think about that. "Leaving" has been changed to "abandoned", four syllables. "Use" was changed to "relations". Woman (one wife, God's plan) was changed to "women" (unnatural). "Burned" was changed to "inflamed". "men with men" was changed to "Men committed shameful acts with other men," (notice how many more syllables and meaning changed as seen above in the previous verse), "receiving" was changed to "and received", "recompence of their error which was meet" (proper, suitable, appropriate). was changed to "due penalty for their error". That is a lot of changes. Who would want all of that unnecessary change against God's commandment not to change, add to, remove, diminish from it? ....more hissing....

• Romans 1:28
• KJV
  And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
• NIV
  Furthermore, just as they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, so God gave them over to a depraved mind, so that they do what ought not to be done.

• ISSUE
  "And" is changed to "furthermore" which means "and" with two more syllables, unnecessarily. "God in their knowledge" was changed to "the knowledge of God"(?????), "re[rpbate" was changed to "depraved", "" was changed to "", "" was changed to ""
  REPROBATE, a. [L. reprobatus, reprobo, to disallow; re and probo, to prove.]
  1. Not enduring proof or trial; not of standard purity or fineness; disallowed; rejected. Reprobate silver shall men call them, because the Lord hath rejected them. Jer 6.
  2. Abandoned in sin; lost to virtue or grace. They profess that they know God, but in works deny him, being abominable and disobedient, and to every good work reprobate. Titus 1.
  3. Abandoned to error, or in apostasy. 2 Tim 3.
  DEPRAVED, pp.
  1. Made bad or worse; vitiated; tainted; corrupted. 2. A. Corrupt; wicked; destitute of holiness or good principles.
  Different words, different meanings.

• Romans 1:29
• KJV
  Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,
• NIV
  They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips,

• ISSUE
  "Unrighteousness", not archaic. "Fornication"...completely removed in this verse, which means "sexual relations outside of marriage". "Covetousness" (wanting what someone else has), replaced by "greed" (avarice, wanting more of what you already have), "maliciousness" removed, "debate" is not archaic but was changed to "strife", "malignity" removed, replaced with "malice", and means
  MALIG'NITY, n. [L. malignitas.] Extreme enmity, or evil dispositions of heart towards another; malice without provocation, or malevolence with baseness of heart; deep rooted spite.
  1. Virulence; destructive tendency; as the malignity of an ulcer or disease.
  2. Extreme evilness of nature; as the malignity of fraud.
  3. Extreme sinfulness; enormity or heinousness; as the malignity of sin.
  MAL'ICE, n. [L.malitia, from malus, evil.] Extreme enmity of heart, or malevolence; a disposition to injure others without cause, from mere personal gratification or from a spirit of revenge; unprovoked malignity or spite. --Nor set down aught in malice.
  Different words, different meanings and completely unnecessary to change it. KJV: backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, NIV: slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents;
  A backbiter slanders, and that behind the person's back who is not there, giving one side of a story. A slanderer:
  SLA'NDER, n.
  1. A false tale or report maliciously uttered. and tending to injure the reputation of another by lessening him in the esteem of his fellow citizens, by exposing min to impeachment and punishment, or by impairing his means of lining; defamation. Slander, that worst of poisons, ever finds an easy entrance to ignoble minds.
  2 Disgrace; reproach; disreputation; ill name.
  "Haters of God" was changed to "God-haters", a compound word with a hyphen in it, not the same word. The word "despiteful;" was changed to "insolent" (two different meanings), "inventors of evil things" was changed to "they invent ways of doing evil" (a complete sentence changed!), "disobedient to parents" was changed to "they disobey their parents; ". which is what the KJV means anyways, so why change it? $$$$$$$!
  IN'SOLENT, a. Proud and haughty, with contempt of others; overbearing; domineering in power; as an insolent master.
  1. Proceeding from insolence; haughty and contemptuous; as insolent words or behavior.
  2. Unaccustomed; the primary sense. [Not used.]
  DESPITEFUL, a. Full of spite; malicious; malignant; as a despiteful enemy. Hater of God, despiteful, proud, boasters. Rom 1.

• KJV: inventors of evil things
  NIV: invent ways of doing evil
  Inventors of things and inventors of ways, not the same.

• Romans 1:30
• KJV
  Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
• NIV
  slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents;
• ISSUE
  A backbiter slanders, and that behind the person's back who is not there, giving one side of a story. A slanderer:
  SLA'NDER, n.
  1. A false tale or report maliciously uttered. and tending to injure the reputation of another by lessening him in the esteem of his fellow citizens, by exposing min to impeachment and punishment, or by impairing his means of lining; defamation. Slander, that worst of poisons, ever finds an easy entrance to ignoble minds.
  2 Disgrace; reproach; disreputation; ill name.
  "Haters of God" was changed to "God-haters", a compound word with a hyphen in it, not the same word. The word "despiteful;" was changed to "insolent" (two different meanings), "inventors of evil things" was changed to "they invent ways of doing evil" (a complete sentence changed!), "disobedient to parents" was changed to "they disobey their parents; ". which is what the KJV means anyways, so why change it? $$$$$$$!
  IN'SOLENT, a. Proud and haughty, with contempt of others; overbearing; domineering in power; as an insolent master.
  1. Proceeding from insolence; haughty and contemptuous; as insolent words or behavior.
  2. Unaccustomed; the primary sense. [Not used.]
  DESPITEFUL, a. Full of spite; malicious; malignant; as a despiteful enemy. Hater of God, despiteful, proud, boasters. Rom 1.

• Romans 1:31
• KJV
  Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:
• NIV
  they have no understanding, no fidelity, no love, no mercy.
• ISSUE
  "Without understanding" (two words) was changed to "they have no understanding" (four words), "covenantbreakers" which is people who break agreements, contracts, covenants, etc. was changed to "no fidelity" or unbelief in Scripture, lack of faith and belief, "without natural affection" was changed to "no love", "implacable" (unable to be pleased, soothed or mollified, no mater what) and "unmerciful" was changed to "no mercy" which means the same thing so it was unnecessary to change it.,
  IMPLACABLE: not placable : not capable of being appeased, significantly changed, or mitigated
  IMPLACABLENESS, n. [from implacable.] The quality of not being appeasable; inexorableness; irreconcilable enmity or anger.

• Romans 1:32
• KJV
  Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
• NIV
  Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them.
• ISSUE
  "Who knowing" which refers to the same people above was changed to "Although they know", "judgment of God" which is a destiny, a sentence, a punishment, was changed to "God’s righteous decree" which only refers to the law itself, without mention of it being broken, and the person judged. changing the meaning with different words. The phrase "are worthy of death" was changed to "deserve death" which are similar in meaning, so no need to change it, "not only do the same" was changed to "they not only continue to do these very things" which again it does not say the same thing. "have pleasure " was changed to "approve of ", which does not imply participation at all, since one does not have the same pleasure in just watching and approving does not mean actually doing. Lastly, "do" was changed to "practice", which is a different word meaning to do and therefore unnecessary to change it. .