WEEK 2 OUTLINE

UNIFORMITARIANISM AND CATASTROPHISM

Before advancing further, I would like to define a few terms. The first is UNIFORMITARIANISM. All that this means is that all processes in nature have gone in the manner and at the rate that it is going on today(amount of dust falling on earth from space, amount of salt flowing into oceans from rivers, amount of sediment build-up, decay rates of elements, etc.) According to the theory of Evolution, this is kind of a law. The uniformitarian principle can simply be stated this way:

"THE PRESENT IS THE KEY TO THE PAST"

By the way, the idea of Uniformitarianism was predicted by God in the Second Letter of Peter, Chapter 3, verses 3-4:

"Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation."

The second term is the term CATASTROPHISM. This implies that the past was quite different than today, and was marked by a great worldwide flood. This flood laid down all of the geologic deposits of the earth in rapid succession, virtually non-stop. There are also Planetary Catastrophists who believe that the geology of the earth reflects a series of periodic collisions from planets, comets, and the space debris. But, for the sake of this course, this side of catastrophism will be included under the CATASTROPHISM umbrella. Besides, it is neither biblical, nor scientifically legitimate.

BOTH OF THESE TERMS ARE VERY IMPORTANT TO REMEMBER

GEOLOGY

The Formation Of The Earth

Many theories have been put forth by the evolutionists as to how the earth came into being. They all generally concur that the earth started out as a gaseous blob, condensing, heating and then cooling to form the crust, mantle, etc. with the core remaining as it is today-molten. This is the generally standard view and the one in almost all of the textbooks on geology from grade school to college. The following is the postulated scenario sequence. This is all based on a theory called the CHEMICAL CONDENSATION SEQUENCE HYPOTHESIS This is, to paraphrase, the order in which the various chemicals would have hardened to form the layers of the earth from core to crust. It goes something like this:

The temperature that they start off with is not agreed upon, however, and a general acceptance of 1000 degrees centigrade is the norm, with variations by different scientists.

This is postulated to have started to condense due to gravity, causing the mass to heat up. The heat is further postulated to originate from radioactivity.

After a billion years with no rocks on the earth, it all finally settles down and hardens to form what we now have today.

The atmosphere is further postulated to originate from the volcanic activity present as the heat in the center explodes at the surface.

Since the melting point of iron is high(a mere 1000 degrees centigrade), it is assumed that for the radioactivity and the condensation to raise the initial temperature of the earth to this height requires around 4.6 billion years-that is where the figure for the age of the earth comes in. The radioactivity is further postulated to have originated from the bombardment of particles from the stars over billions of years. This molten blob is postulated to produce convection cycles(winds) and to cool to form the crust, etc.

There are many problems with this from start to finish. The textbooks will never reveal these, however, and will leave the impression that this is proven, written in stone, and beyond question. This is not the case at all, as we will see in a further examination of the theory vs. the facts.

First off, the idea that a gas cloud will condense is a defiance of the laws of physics. Smoke from a cigarette will dissipate into the atmosphere and fill the room end to end without stopping until complete. It will not ever condense to form a little smoke ball, though non-smokers would like to see this! This has never been demonstrated in a laboratory as possible.

Second, the idea about the radioactivity from the distant stars is without merit as it has never been shown that this has happened or that it is even possible to get the amount necessary to raise the temperature of a gas cloud or a condensing ball(which was above shown already to be defying the laws of physics).

Third, the radioactive materials have only found to be on the outside of the earth, not on the inside, a prediction from this theory.

Fourth, a consideration has not been made for the probability of heat loss. Does the heat enter a gas cloud, condensing and being bombarded from outer space with radioactive particles, and not cool off at a rate equal to the rate at which it is entering? There is no insulation available to prevent this from happening, according to the theory. This happens later from volcanic activity, as mentioned earlier.

Fifth, the atmosphere is presumed to originate at this time from the gasses exuded out of volcanoes, gas clouds condensing.

There is a problem here in that there is no source for the amount of oxygen now present in the atmosphere. This is an enigma as the concept of "the present is the key to the past" says that this amount was nearly con stant throughout earth's history. Soooo.... it is FURTHER postulated that algae is the source of the oxygen-through photosynthesis.

Dr. Robert Gentry is one of this country's greatest physicists. While drilling cores into the earth way down to the basement granite, he discovered various types of Polonium halos.

Polonium comes from the decay of Uranium and the half life for the various types of Polonium varies. The uranium gives off two particles-Alpha and Beta. The Alpha is helium atom with no electrons and the Beta is an electron.

What these do when they decay is they leave a spherical burn mark in the rock, called a halo. The half life of a substance is the period of time required for half of the amount to change into another substance. For instance, if you had a pound of a substance "A" with a half life of ten years, after ten years you would have five pounds of the original substance "A" and five pounds of a new substance "B" into which it decays. Another ten years and you would have half of the remaining half pound of "A" turned or decayed into the new substance "B". The ratio now will be one quarter pound of "A" to three quarter pounds of "B". Continuing on another ten years reveals one eighth pound of "A" is left while seven eighth pounds of "B" is present.

Also, the longer the half-life of the substance, the smaller the radius of the halo, the shorter the half-life, the further away from the center the halo is manifested. This is a general rule and there are exceptions.

The decay rates of Polonium are well known and are very accurate for today, although the decay rate for the past would be unknown. And yet, the evolution model predicts that the rate is the same today as in the past. So any counter argument from the evolutionists regarding the decay rate(ie. it is slowing down) goes against the theory of evolution.

In one case polonium was found with no uranium. The significance of this is that the Uranium is the source!

The evolutionists argued that the uranium would be found nearby and would be determined to be the source of the halos, but this was found not to be the case.

Another thing that Dr. Gentry discovered is that there were lead and helium found in the zircon that they dug up. The fact that there were these two elements is no big deal, however, the problem was that these elements were found in the exact same concentration down deep in the ground as up at the surface. This is significant in that since these elements cool at a lower temperature, they should have been the last tocool during the earth's cooling process and therefore should have mostly if not all migrated to the surface, as is common today in volcanic eruptions.

Plate Tectonics

There is a theory about the continents of the earth concerning their postulated movements toward and away from each other as well as the fit of their edges together-much like a puzzle.

This theory is called the theory of Plate Tectonics. Once again it is a theory treated in textbooks as a fact. Upon initial inspection one might easily conclude that this is more of a law than a theory, but, as usual, the idea has it's problems just like the Big Bang, the Nebular Hypothesis, The Steady State Theory, etc.

First, let us look at the idea in a nut shell. There are considered to be 12 plates which fit like a puzzle around the Globe. These plates are believed to have in such a position in the distant past(200 million to 250 million years ago) as to put all of the continents together to form one large land mass called Pangaea. Some of these plates seem to be separating, or diverging, and others seem to be coming together, or diverging.

For instance, the Pacific Ocean seems to be shrinking while the Atlantic seems to be expanding.

1620: The history of plate tectonics started off with Francis Bacon. Later the idea was continued with a man named Snyder in the 1800's. Edward Zeuss carried the idea forward into the twentieth century, while Alfred Wegener is said to have at first shocked and then later enlightened the geologic community with his theories. Mr. Wegener was a meteorologist and he saw that there were very similar layers on many different continents around the world, seemingly in the same basic order.

In other words, the "ages" of the geologic column-to bediscussed later-were the same around the world. In Wegener's mind, the continents all had the same origin and touched in the DISTANT PAST. For instance, "tillite", or glacial deposits, were the same in South America, South Africa, and Antarctica. He also saw "scour" lines from the different continents that lined up in a perfect match.

1928: Arthur Holmes proposed the idea that during this process wherein one plate was subducting under another, convections or "heat and cold currents" were set up in the crust.

In the 1960's Harry Hess gave us the sea floor spreading concept that is populartoday. He proposed that divergent junctions were caused by magma coming out at the surface. The junctions of these plates have three different geological names-divergentjunction, convergent junction, and Transform Faults.

At the DIVERGENT JUNCTION there is volcanic activity in the form of a lava flow out to the surface and away from this point, downward on a slope, pulled by gravity. It is postulated that this lava forces the plates apart.

The characteristics of a divergent junction are earthquakes, vulcanism(obviously) and sea floor spreading(not so obvious).

The characteristics of a DIVERGENT JUNCTION are:

First-what is termed a SUBDUCTION area. This is where the oceanic crust, made mostly of denser basalt(4), slides under the less dense, granitic(density 2.3) continental crust.

This section of crust then goes back down whence it came to the center of the earth to be remelted, only to return to the surface.

The part that stays and is scraped over the top is turned into mountains of sedimentary and metamorphic rock.

Second, the contact point of a convergent junction is continents banging together.

Third, there is mountain building from the crust bending, folding,etc.

Fourth, there trenches or deep cracks in the crust.

Fifth, there are both shallow AND deep earthquakes occurring in the area regularly. The shallow ones occur at the mid oceanic ridge, and the deep ones tending to occur at the plate boundaries. Sixth, there seems to be a lot of metamorphic rock at the junction of the two crusts. This may be from the tremendous heat caused from friction. The Himalayan mountain range would come under this category.

Lastly, there are TRANSFORM FAULTS. The San Andreas Fault is but one example of this.

There are many problems with the plate tectonic theory, but few students of geology are ever exposed to them. The handling of the data for this theory is handled much in the same way as dating methods, fossil man, etc. To speak out against this theory is to instantly be labeled a "heretic". This form of intimidation is very common in scientific circles today, as the Creation-Evolution controversy will attest.

There is also a problem with the Himalayas, in that they are not eroded. Could they be young?

In fact, the notion of the fossil fish and shells in the Siwalik Hills and the rest of the Himalayas being the result of a worldwide hydraulic catastrophe, as described in Genesis chapters 6-8, better known as the Flood of Noah, has been replaced with the notion of their being placed there by plate tectonics.


Grand Canyon/Mt. Saint Helens Comparison

All Rocks In All Layers

Igneous Rocks

The total amount of volcanic rock on the surface of the earth is so small that this limits the age of the earth by billions of years. In other words, the amount that is coming upon the earth every year is insufficient to account for it all.

With all the volcanoes on the earth, nothing in the supposed 4.5 billion year history of the earth could account for this lack of volcanic material. A certain Carl Fries estimated that the flow of Lava from the Paracutin Volcano in Mexico was about .2 Cubic Kilometers. There are an average of 12 volcanoes a year erupting. 12 X .2 = 2.4 cubic kilometers.

You see, the amount of igneous rock on the earths surface produced each year is about 10 cubic kilometers. The total amount on the earth is about 5 x 10^9 Cu. Kilometers. The time required to produce that volum e is about 500 million years. But the Evolutionists insist that the earth is about 4 billion years old. Calculated by Carl Fries, Jr., " Volume and weights of Pyroclastic Material, Lava and water erupted by Paracutin Volcano ", Transactions , American Geophysical Union, Vol. 34(August 1953). p. 611.

So here is the problem: If "The present is the key to the Past", as the Evolutionist insists, then the same rate would be applied to the past . This sort of puts an upper limit on the age of the earth, way below the supposed Evolutionary age. However, if they say that maybe there was less volcanic activity in the past, then they are going against their principle of Uniformitarianism. A two-edged sword.

Metamorphic Rocks

Sedimentary Rocks

Conglomerate Rocks Shales

Chert

Sandstone

Limestones And Dolomites

Evaporites

Deep-sea Deposits:

Either of only two explanations by science:

  1. Moved there by water.
  2. Continent with lakes sank- crazy, since only freshwater animals are found in cores, where are land animals from continent?

Coal, Oil, Natural Gas-High Pressure COAL

OIL

"Government or oil companies hope to be able to produce 1.1 billion gallons/year from 880 million tons of organic garbage."
-Science Digest Vol. 74(July 1973)Larry L. Anderson

Metals

Got Any Nickel? How About Helium?

Of Chemicals And Rivers

Many chemicals have been calculated:

Sodium 260,000,000
Magnesium 45,000,000
Silicon 8,000
Potassium 11,000,000
Copper 50,000
Gold 560,000
Silver 2,100,000
Mercury 42,000
Lead 2,000
Nickel 18,000
Uranium 500,000
Aluminum 100

So what's the point?(What is Creation Science in back) All these calculations show young earth. Actually, most do. Virtually none of the ages based on this type of information show an age acceptable to evolutionists. But, they are based on uniformitarianism. Only logical conclusions are that "Present is not key to past", or earth is young. Both support Creationism.

FOSSILS

What They Are

How They Are Formed

One main process only, in which you must have all of the following:

  1. Water
  2. Dead animal
  3. Mud, clay, sand
  4. Cement

Fossilization Process

Geologic Column-or Geologic Time Table

The Geologic Column was invented by several men-from Great Britain, France, and Scotland. They traveled around and collected data on the layers they found. Then they compiled this into the present day Geologic Column. The Column has not really changed in 100 years, but the dates have. Every fifteen years the ages have doubled for the earth. It is supposedly the fossils of all ages throughout time.

The Problems Associated With The Geologic Column

The Problems With The Geologic Column

"We are only kidding ourselves if we think that we have anything like a complete succession of the stratigraphical column in any one place."
-Derek V. Ager, The Nature Of The Stratigraphical Record, 2nd Edition, New York, New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1981, p.32.
In Science , Vol. 200, May 5, 1978, A report was written on fish being found in the Cambrian rocks. This would constitute all of the major phyla being found in the lowest layers of the earth-long before they all would have existed.

NOTE: There is a practice in paleontology wherein the same organism found in different layers is given different names. This is widespread and totally unscientific, according to Dr. Colin Patterson, in an interview w ith Luther Sunderland in Darwin's Enigma.(ED228 056).

Trilobites No Ancestors

Did trilobites accidentally stumble onto this perfect design?
Did they somehow know about optics at a postulated time "billions" of years before man ever discovered it?

To achieve this marvel in engineering, the trilobite had to master three laws, principles of optics-Fermat's principle of optics, Abbe's Sine Law, and Snell's Law of refraction, plus the optics of birefringent(or double refractive) crystals-all of these without one single course in Optics! This course or courses would take an entire semester to teach.

These were all discovered in the era of modern science. Complex invertebrate already. So can't be a link with single-celled organisms.

Norman Macbeth: "...but the more complicated it is, the less likely it is simply to have grown up out of nothing. And this situation has troubled everybody from the beginning-to have everything at the very opening of the drama. The curtain goes up and you have the players on the stage already, entirely in modern costumes."
-Excerpt from debate with Dr. Kenneth Miller at Harvard University, September 1983.
"It was the first use of optics, in combination with sensory perception, and, for my money, the most incredible event in the history of evolution". -Gordon Rattray Taylor, The Great Evolution Mystery, Harper & Row Publ., New York, 1983, p. 95.

Insect No Ancestors

Not Used By Any Scientists As Proof Of Evolution

Fossils are often not brought up by the top Evolutionists in debates AS MUCH ANYMORE because of embarrassment from bankruptcy of the fossil record. Debaters today are more layperson-type than the full-blown book writing, lecturing, big time Evolutionist.

WHAT DO THE FOSSILS SAY?

No Transitional Forms

There are about 100 million fossils in our museums today. The argument made for a lack of fossils is completely false.
Write to any paleontological museum.
If they don't have them......
Ought to be billions of them after 130 years.
Francisco Ayala, a professor of biology at the University of California, Davis:

"The Evolutionary origins of taxa in the higher categories are poorly known....Most orders, classes, and phyla appear abruptly and commonly have already acquired all of the characteristics that distinguish them".

Also he concludes:

"We are forced to the conclusion that most of the really novel taxa that appear suddenly in the fossil record did in fact originate suddenly".

" The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the TRADE SECRET of paleontology the Evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils." -Stephen Jay Gould, "Evolutions Erratic Pace",Natural History,Vol.86, No.5, May 1977,p.14.

"As it turns out, all one can learn about the history of life is from systematics, from the groupings one finds in nature. The rest of it is story telling of one sort or another. We have access to the tips of the tree; the tree itself is theory, and people who pretend to know about the tree and to describe what went on it-how the branches came off, and the twigs came off-are, I think, telling stories".
-Colin Patterson, a senior paleontologist with the British Museum of Natural History in London, on the B.B.C. March 4, 1982.

Dr. Niles Eldredge, at a convention of science writers in Gatlinburg, Tennessee; November 19, 1978, as recorded in the Los Angeles Times:

"But no one has found any such in-between creatures. This was long chalked up to 'gaps' in the fossil records, gaps that proponents of gradualism confidently expected to fill in someday when rock strata of the proper antiquity were eventually located. But all of the fossil evidence to date has failed to turn up any such missing links, Eldredge said and there is a growing conviction among many scientists that these transitional forms never existed. And if this is so, then the gradualist view of Evolution is an inaccurate portrayal of how life developed."

"Why don't we find these gradations in the fossil record, and why, instead of collecting thousands of identical individuals, do we not find more inte rmediary forms? To this Mr. Darwin replies that we have only a few incomplete pages in the great book of nature and the transitions have been in the pages which we lack. By why then, and by what peculiar rules of probability does it happen that the species we find most frequently and most abundantly in all the newly discovered beds are in the immense majority of the cases species which we already have in our collections?" D.L. Hull, (1973) Darwin and His Critics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., p.450.

All Animals Lived With Man

3. Frozen Mammoths

  1. They died in the summer.
  2. . They were flash frozen, as it has been shown that to prevent the stomach acids from beginning the digestion process requires an instantaneous drop in temperature of 150 degrees! In the middle of the summer!

4. Fossil Graveyards

On page 183: " this fact is very important...."

Life of a Fossil Hunter by Charles H. Sternberg tells of a Graveyard in western Kansas, in Logan County, where there are four huge formations The first is reddish and blue chalk, the second is black shale, ascending up to the third layer, which is mortar or limestone. The reddish and blue chalk has the abundant(very) remains of swimming lizards, Pteranodons, the toothed bird Hesperornis, Icthyornis, fish of all sizes to sixteen feet, large sea tortoises. The black shale contains the remains of countless dinosaurs. Above this, in the mortar beds, lie the remains of many short-legged rhinoceros, the large land turtle, small type mastodons, saber-toothed tigers, and a one and a half foot tall deer.

5. The Smell Of Burning Bone

Sometimes when paleontologists cut into a dinosaur bone, there is a smell of burning bone, indicating that the bone is not completely fossilized. After 65 million years!

6."There Were Giants In Those Days"

Giant human footprints have been found in "Cretaceous"Strata, in White Sands, New Mexico; near Mt. Whitney, California; in Arizona; in the Paluxy River bed in Glen Rose, Texas. Many are up to fifteen inches long and are not carved. The beds of these giants have been discovered in the Middle East. These beds are ten feet long. The tracks are indistinguishable from normal size footprints except for the size, and wouldn't be in question if they were not so large.

In stone.

Also human and dinosaur footprints in Paluxy River; Texas. One trail in Texas has the man walking in the dinosaur's tracks, and a child walking in the man's tracks. By themselves the prints would not be in question, but seeing as they are together.....

7. Water Marks Fossilized

Ripple marks have been fossilized on the top of stone formations. Denotes fast hardening and burial. Also raindrops.

8. Archeopteryx

WHAT DO THE EVOLUTIONISTS SAY?

L. du Nouy, Human Destiny , The New American Library, New York,1947, p.58:

"... we are not authorized to consider the exceptional case of the Archeopteryx as a true link. By link we mean a necessary stage of transition between classes such as reptiles and birds, or between smaller groups. An animal displaying characters belonging to two different groups cannot be treated as a true link as long as the intermediary stages have not been found, and as long as the mechanisms of transition remain unknown."

Incidentally, he hates Creation Scientists.

W.E. Swinton, an expert on birds, in Biology and Comparative Physiology of Birds , Vol. 1, A.J. Marshall, Ed., Academic Press, New York, 1960, p. 1:

"The origin of birds is largely a matter of deduction. There is no fossil evidence of the stages through which the remarkable change from reptile to bird was achieved".

A.S. Romer, Notes and Comments on Vertebrate Paleontology, University of Chicago Press, 1968, p. 144:

"This Jurassic bird [Archeopteryx] stands in splendid isolation; we know no more of its presumed thecodont ancestry nor of its relation to later 'proper' birds than before"

9. The Dawn Horse-Backwards Evolution!

WHAT DO THE EVOLUTIONISTS SAY?

George Gaylord Simpson said in Life of the Past :

"The Uniform continuous transformation from Hyracotherium into Equus, so dear to the hearts of generations of textbook writers, neverhappened in nature." Birdsell:

"The Evolution of the foot mechanisms proceeded by rapid and abrupt changes rather than gradual ones. The transition from the form of foot shown by miniature Eohippus to larger consistently three-toed Miohippus was so abrupt that it even left no record in the fossil deposits....their foot structure changed very rapidly to a three-toed sprung foot in which the pad disappeared and the two sides became essentially functionless. Finally, in the Pliocene the line leading to the modern one-toed grazer went through a rapid loss of the two side toes on each foot."

"Essentially functionless" indicates that this "vestigial" organ would have been naturally selected out, according to the Evolutionary theory.

G.A. Kerkut, Implications Of Evolution:

"In the first place it is not clear that Hyracotherium was the ancestral horse. Thus Simpson states,

'Matthew has shown and insisted that Hyracotherium (including Eohippus) is so primitive that it is not much more definitely equid than tapirid, rhinocerotid etc., but it is customary to place it at the root of the equid group".

Looks like it could be a tapir or a rhinoceros, but it depends on where one wants to classify it.

David M. Raup, Conflicts Between Darwin and Paleontology:

"Well, we are now about 120 years after Darwin, and...ironically, we have even fewer examples of Evolutionary transition than we had in Darwin's time. By this I mean that some of the classic cases of Darwinian change in the fossil record, such as the Evolution of the horse in North America, have had to be discarded or modified as the result of more detailed information".

This is true of all of the disciplines of science touched by Evolution.

David B. Kitts(School of Geology and Geophysics, University of Oklahoma), "Paleontology and Evolutionary Theory," Evolution, Vol. 28, September 1974, p. 467:

"Despite the bright promise that paleontology provides a means of 'seeing' Evolution, it has presented some nasty difficulties for Evolutionists, the most notorious of which is the presence of 'gaps' in the fossil record. Evolution requires intermediate forms between species and paleontology does not provide them." 10. The Crossopterygian Fish And The Icthyostegid Amphibian

This is another example of something being blown out of proportion. There is a fish in the fossil record called the Crossopterygian which has a face that looks like the face of a reptile or amphibian. The Evolutionists argue from this resemblance that it evolved from an amphibian in the fossil record called the icthyostegid.

The time involved with this type of change can not be exaggerated. Millions of years would have passed while the fins of the Crossopterygian would have become the legs of the Icthyostega. Yet, throughout all of this time, it left no evidence of this change in the fossil record. This is truly amazing.

Besides this, long before this supposed limb would have been a good leg, it would have been a bad fin, and the fish would have neither been able to swim properly nor walked. Perfect prey.

Also, in 1939, a specimen of the Crossopterygian fish was caught in Africa, 5,000 feet down. It is called Latimeria. The idea is this: did the fish not evolve for hundreds of millions of years while the amphibians did? Why? looks like the fossil Crossopterygian. Something is very wrong with the geologic column if this type of hypothesis is relied upon to predict data.

F.D. Ommanney, The Fishes , Life Nature Library, Time-Life, Inc., New York, 1964, p. 60:

"How this earliest chordate stock evolved, What stages of development it went through to eventually give rise to truly fish-like creatures, we do not know. Between the Cambrian when it probably originated, and the Ordovician when the first fossils of animals with fish-like characteristics appeared, there is a gap of perhaps 100 million years which we will probably never be able to fill."

Lastly, to make matters worse, the pelvic muscles, bones, and vertebrae are of a different type in the fish than the amphibians. Completely different.

NOTE: The walking catfish is another desperate reach of the Evolutionists at proving Evolution. They actually do not walk at all. They slither or swim on the ground-BUT THEY DO NOT WALK!

11. Insects-Same As Today, Hard To Fossilize

I REST MY CASE- CREATION IS THE BETTER EXPLANATION!

12. Once A Rodent, Always A Rodent

Note: ONE SINGLE MISTAKE in the Evolution of the porcupine, like the spines turning out hardened BEFORE birth, and NO MORE PORCUPINES!

13. Backbones From Shells?

The gap between the Invertebrates and vertebrates is huge, and this is the most significant and damaging fact known to scientists.There is a time span of perhaps 100,000,000 years between them in the supposed Evolution of vertebrates from invertebrates.During this time, no doubt ZILLIONS of individual animals which would have been evolving must have lived, yet not even one single fossil exists to show this. Since Evolutionists insist on uniformitarianism, and that fossils are not the result of anything special, why do they not exist? Darwin once said that in his time, not enough fossils had been dug up to prove Evolution conclusively, yet since Darwin billions of fossils have been found, making a mockery of the theory!

14. Why No Fossils In PreCambrian?

There is a supposed time gap, or period of one to twenty six BILLION years of universal history before life entered the scene. Then, all of a sudden-PUFF!-like magic, the scene completely changes to a plethora of unique plant and animal life.

The fossil record goes from single cells directly to complex forms of life such as trilobites, copepods, starfish, sponges, corals, etc. there is no record in stone of the years between the two. Serious blow to Evolution.

The Pre-Cambrian layers are completely void of any fossils. 15. Where Did All The Mammals Come From?

16. Cave Paintings Of Dinosaurs

In the Grand Canyon, on the Floor of the canyon, there is a cave painting of a dinosaur. The painting is well known by Evolutionists and has been for years. The controversy has only brewed as to the origin and timing of the paintings when Evolution became popular as well as dogmatic in the U.S.

Before that time no person said anything about it.The local Indians also knew about it. They never saw any significance in the paintings, but now the Evolutionists, all of a sudden, have rejected them as being nothing more than a hoax or prank.

17. Pterodactyls, Too Cave paintings of Pterodactyls have also been found in Mexico. Same story as above.

18. Smashed Dinosaurs!

Dinosaur Bones, when you see them being dug up by paleontologists, always seem to be alone, because they are not laid out, usually, as a complete skeleton. Red Deer River Valley in Alberta, Canada: Graveyard where they were all brought together to perish in some great catastrophe.

Life Of A Fossil Hunter ; Mr.Charles H. Sternberg describes these and other graveyards. There are places in the Great Northwest where there are many dinosaurs smashed together into the side of a mountain. They are in heaps. No explanation can come from uniformitarianism and these examples are more the rule than the exception.

19. The Weird Things Found In The Ground In the Ordovician layers of the earth, paleontologists have recently dug up a man-made hammer. This was no ordinary hammer, since when they scratched the surface of the metal, it was iron. The thing that is amazing about this iron is that it has never rusted to this day.

Other examples of human artifacts found in rock layers dated according to the theory of evolution to be millions of years before man supposedly evolved are the following:

These items were firmly encased in coal and coal miners are well aware of these types of discoveries.

Also found were:

These are all very obvious evidence of human habitation where humans do not belong.

The evolutionists either discard, disregard, ignore or do not report these types of finds as a general rule. If the evidence does "leak" out, then they try to explain them away as misplaced by cracks in the earth due to earthquakes or other geologic disasters, otherwise kown as "intrusive burials".

No evidence has ever been presented conclusively by anyone for these disasters.

The only logical explanation is that someone dropped the items and they got buried. No interpretation is necessary if the location of the artifacts can be accepted at face value for what it is.

The evolutionists have to explain these types of discoveries away, the creationists predict them!

Diatomaceous earth is an amorphous form of silica containing a small amount of microcrystalline material.

In Lompoc, California on the property of the Dicalite Division of the Grefco Corporation, there is a whale buried and fossilized in the ground. This is nothing to write home about except that the whale is straight up and down, lying on it's tail. Even this could be explained possibly, but the thing is that it is located in the middle of a formation of diatomaceous earth.

The idea is that the whale would have had to lay in this uncomfortable position for thousands even millions of years while the diatom populations slowly died out, making sure that it does not decay in an way,all the time being dead!

Question: Whay are not these types of formations being formed today?

Week 3 Notes